Monday 31 March 2014

If You Are Investing in Iskandar, What Should You Be Buying? Land (Leisure Farm) and Houses (Affordable Ones)!

Oversupply in Iskandar

Let's get this straight. There is definitely an oversupply in Iskandar. It has a population of 1.8 million, and an existing housing stock of 420k. There is another 150k being built and likely to be completed in the next five years. Occupancy rate of offices in Iskandar is below 70%. Vacancy rates of residential units is over 15%. Note that this is alarming, because in Singapore, vacancy rates are close to 10%. In Melbourne around 2.5%, Sydney 2.1% and Brisbane around 2%. In London, the vacancy rate is close to 1.5%. There is extreme undersupply of homes in OECD because home building has not caught up with demand. but there is extreme oversupply in Asia.

If you buy a condo > RM1m, chances are you cannot sell it to a local because they won't buy condos from you at that price. For goodness sake, they could buy a condo located in JB old town for as little as RM500k. Why buy from a foreigner? The more affordable and older condos are around 300 - 400k! Don't start arguing that yours is new so it deserves a premium, because all condos start as new and after ten years, look very aged.

Your rental yield will be close to 3% because no tenants will pay you over RM2.5k per month. If they can afford to pay over 3k per month, chances are they can afford to buy a unit to live in.

If you buy a terrace, semi-detached or bungalow for > RM1m, chances are you also cannot sell it to a local there are plenty of landed units for around RM600 - 800k in good areas. In more affordable areas, you can get something for between 400 - 500k.

Rental wise you also are unlikely to get over 3k. So all properties in Iskandar will be negatively geared if you obtain a 75% LTV at 4.5% interest!

So condos to foreigners are going for > RM1k psf. Condos for locals 300 - 600 psf.

Houses for foreigners RM300 - 500 psf. For locals, they can go for as little as 200 - 400 psf.

Which Asset Classes In Iskandar Are Undervalued?

The median annual wage of a Singaporean is about SGD70k. For Malaysians, RM44k. A Singaporean's wage is about 4.1x of a Malaysian's.

Rule 1: Always buy something that the locals will eventually buy off you.

Let's look at how affordable condos are.

A typical condo for foreigner costs RM1m, say for 1000 sf. That's roughly RM1000 psf. In Singapore, Jurong and Woodlands condos are going for around SGD800 - 1200 psf. Let's say Singapore is SGD1000 psf. That's 2.6x. This is extremely over valued.

A typical condo for locals costs RM400k, or RM400 psf. That's 6.5x. So condos for locals are still cheap in Johor vs SG. But can you buy them? What about the oversupply situation?

Let's look at houses.

A typical semi-detached, bungalow and terrace costs around RM500 - 800 psf of land. For Singapore, it's around SGD800 - 1200 psf. Singapore's houses are about 3.5x of Johor's. This makes the houses for foreigners overvalued vs Singapore.

A similar house that locals live can range from 300 - 400 psf. This is 7.4x cheaper than Singapore. This makes the houses that locals buy much better value.

Let's look at land, primarily Leisure Farm.

Rule 2. Buy land that is flat and fully utilisable.

Rule 3. Make sure the security is extremely good.

Leisure Farm has two levels of security. The first is at the gate manned by Gurkhas. They will never let you pass. Ledang Heights' security is manned by locals and I've seen agents getting past by just nodding and smiling to the guards.

There is a second layer of security, which requires an access card to the different sub plots. There is none for Ledang Heights.

Ledang Heights terrain is hilly and sometimes forested. Leisure Farm is flat throughout.

There is an access road that will connect the highway to Leisure Farm to be completed by end of 2014. You won't need to go to LF via Kampung Roads from 2015.

You can obtain bank financing for both Leisure Farm and Ledang Heights.

Land in Leisure Farm is going for between RM230 - 250 psf. In Singapore, land in Jurong and Woodlands is going for between SGD700 - 1000 psf according to recent govt land sales.

Leisure Farm land is 9.2x cheaper than Singapore's.

Conclusion:

1. Land is not scarce in Johor. However, land that is near or within developed areas like JB and Nusajaya will eventually be scarcer.

2. Avoid buying land in the peripheral of Iskandar. It may take a long while to see capital appreciation.

3. Financing can be tricky for foreigners buying land. But it is possible.

4. Condos and houses that foreigners are eligible to buy are extremely unaffordable to locals. The exit strategy is murky and I suspect many foreigners will not see much capital appreciation.

5. Condos and houses that locals buy are cheap vs Singapore, but the oversupply will make rental yields barely enough to pay for mortgages if you assume 75% LTV.

6. Since there is oversupply in houses and condos, why not buy land? It is the most affordable of all. They range from as little as RM1m to 4m for residential plots of between 8k sf to 18k sf. However, do expect to have holding power because there is no rental income and if you take a mortgage you must be able to service the payments.


7. Be wary of flood prone areas when you buy houses / land.

8. Security is of utmost importance. Many prominent politicians / businessmen / royalties own land in Leisure Farm / Ledang Heights.

8. Mark Twain said, "Buy land, they ain't making it any more".

Below is an example of a plot of land for sale in Leisure Farm. Do your own homework. You don't necessarily need to buy this plot. But they usually don't stay on the market for long...


http://www.iproperty.com.my/propertylisting/2702065/gelang-patah-residential-land-forsale

 

Sunday 30 March 2014

You Can't Get Rich By Working 9-to-5!

How the Rich Make their Money

Michael YardneyAbout Michael Yardney
Michael is a director of Metropole Property Strategists who create wealth for their clients through independent, unbiased property advice and advocacy. He has been voted Australia's leading property investment adviser and his opinions are regularly featured in the media. Visit Metropole.com.au
Last year an article in BRW explained that if you think the wealthy make their money slaving over a desk like ordinary folk you’ll never be rich.
They cited Inc.com who combed through the US Internal Revenue Service’s latest annual report into big earners and broke down how they earned their keep, which was as follows:
  • Wages and salaries – 8.6 per cent
  • Interest – 6.6 per cent
  • Dividends – 13 per cent
  • Partnerships and corporations – 19.9 per cent
  • Capital gains – 45.8 per cent
The clear message from this appears to be, if you want to get rich invest for capital growth.
Now if you’ve been following my blogs you’ll know that this is what I’ve been saying for years.
I’ve always recommended buying well located residential properties and building a substantial asset base that will one day replace your personal exertion incomes.
If you think about it, as you build an extensive property portfolio, over the years the vast majority of your profit will be capital growth and not rents.
It’s really the same for homeowners.
If you bought your house 10 years ago for $250,000 and it’s worth half a million dollars today, the bulk of your wealth is not from your savings and paying off your mortgage but from capital growth.
What about in the future when capital growth will be lower?
There’s no doubt that over the next few years we’ll experience a lower overall rate of capital growth in property values.
Does that mean that property investment doesn’t make sense at the moment, or that you should invest for cash flow?
The simple answer to both questions is NO!
Cash flow is necessary to keep you in the property markets, but it’s really capital growth that will make you wealthy.
And while overall the markets are flat, there are still pockets of strong capital growth. It’s a bit like me putting one hand in a bucket of ice water and the other in a bucket of hot water and saying: “overall the temperature is comfortable.”
In all of our capital cities there are some areas where demand is outstripping supply, pushing up prices.
My 4 stranded strategic approach to property investing.
While at any time there are hundreds of thousands of properties for sale, not all will make good investments. In fact most won’t.
To ensure I buy a property that will outperform the market averages I use a 4 Stranded Strategic Approach.
1. I buy a property below its intrinsic value.
2. In an area that has a long history of strong capital growth
3. I look for a property with a twist – something unique or special or different or scarce about the it.
4. And a property where I can “manufacture capital growth” through refurbishment renovations or redevelopment.
By following my 4 Stranded Strategic Approach I minimise my risks and maximise my upside as each strand represents a way of making money from property and combining all four is a powerful way of putting the odds in my favour.
If one strand lets me down, I have two or three others supporting my property’s performance.
If you want to gain a degree of financial freedom, I suggest you consider investing for capital growth too.

Monday 17 March 2014

Similarities Between The Handling of MHA370 and City Planning

I am very sympathetic to the families of the passengers on board MHA370. I pray that for some miracle, they are still alive. However, the handling of the crisis by the Malaysian authority has highlighted some similarities with the way they plan their cities. Here are the reasons:

1. Poor security at the airport, allowing potential hijackers to get on board. Similarly, I believe this lack of security is pervasive in most of Malaysia.

2. Various departments do not coordinate with each other. Negligence in their duty. This is the same with the cities they govern because often we see poorly connected roads, haphazardly planned buildings, arbitrarily released land resulting in urban sprawl, massive over supply.

3. Delays in giving information, getting things done. In Malaysia, you can purchase a condo or bungalow, but not receive the title even after several years. When it is time to sell, you may be shocked that the title is not transferred to your mortgagor.

I truly hope that the families of the passengers receive some form of closure very soon.

Wednesday 12 March 2014

Warren Buffett's Tips, and Khaw Boon Wan's Advice on Overseas Properties

http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/khaw-warns-risks-buying-overseas-property-030310151--sector.html

Minister Khaw Boon Wan has finally stepped in to educate the public. I find that Singaporeans tend to be a very docile bunch. They base their investing on trust and don't work their numbers. They also don't drive a very hard bargain.

One area the government should look at is property investment clubs. I find that some make wild promises, employ unethical sales tactics, extract membership fees from investors and then dish out expensive properties to members. One such club who's CEO has the initials WK is notorious for selling many Philippines, Thailand properties with very high mark ups. She appears regularly on magazines about investing.

I've made a foray into Australia. I won't reveal the city yet but it's along the lines of what I've said all along in my blog. I believe some cities can double in price within 10 years!

Warren Buffett’s five tips for investing in real estate

  
By Katherine Jimenez, 5 March 2014, source: Property Observer
He is known as the Wizard of Omaha and considered to be one of the world's most successful investors.
And for thousands of investors around the world, Warren Buffett has become their investment guru.
Every year, through his letter to Berkshire-Hathaway shareholders, the legendary investor offers his wisdom on anything from his rules for investing in stocks to the US and global economies or even Bitcoin.
This week, Buffett he again released his highly anticipated annual shareholder newsletter and this time, front and centre of his letter was real estate investment.
Specifically, he reflected on two small properties that he purchased long ago and offered some insights on real estate investment.
One purchase involved a 400 hectare farm in Nebraska, which cost him $280,000 in 1986.
The other purchase, which he made with a small group of investors a few years later, was a retail property in New York.
The common theme in these tales was that he purchased both assets after property collapses.
In his letter, Buffett says he cites the tales to "illustrate certain fundamentals of investing".
He then goes on to highlight his five tips for real estate investing.
They are:
number-1You don't need to be an expert in order to achieve satisfactory investment returns.  But if you aren’t, you must recognize your limitations and follow a course certain to work reasonably well. Keep things simple and don’t swing for the fences. When promised quick profits, respond with a quick “no.”
number-2Focus on the future productivity of the asset you are considering. If you don’t feel comfortable making a rough estimate of the asset’s future earnings, just forget it and move on. No one has the ability to evaluate every investment possibility. But omniscience isn’t necessary; you only need to understand the actions you undertake.
number-3If you instead focus on the prospective price change of a contemplated purchase, you are speculating. There is nothing improper about that. I know, however, that I am unable to speculate successfully, and I am sceptical of those who claim sustained success at doing so. Half of all coin-flippers will win their first toss; none of those winners has an expectation of profit if he continues to play the game. And the fact that a given asset has appreciated in the recent past is never a reason to buy it.
number-4With my two small investments, I thought only of what the properties would produce and cared not at all about their daily valuations. Games are won by players who focus on the playing field – not by those whose eyes are glued to the scoreboard. If you can enjoy Saturdays and Sundays without looking at stock prices, give it a try on weekdays.
number-5Forming macro opinions or listening to the macro or market predictions of others is a waste of time. Indeed, it is dangerous because it may blur your vision of the facts that are truly important. (When I hear TV commentators glibly opine on what the market will do next, I am reminded of Mickey Mantle’s scathing comment: “You don’t know how easy this game is until you get into that broadcasting booth.”
- See more at: http://openwealthcreation.com.au/warren-buffetts-five-tips-for-investing-in-real-estate-2/#sthash.FMOmV4x4.dpuf
 

Monday 10 March 2014

Johor Chokes on Property - Run For Your Lives

 
 
 
I mentioned as early as April 2013 that the capital appreciation phase for Iskandar is over. I always believe that a city with rental yields lower than mortgage costs has no fundamentals. I like cities like London, Birmingham, most US coastal cities like New York, Florida, LA, or oil cities like Houston and Austin. I also like Australian cities very much, like Brisbane and Perth. But I like continental European cities that are the epicentre of the Global Financial Crisis the most: Madrid, Dublin, Milan, Rome, Barcelona, Lisbon.
 
For the next five years, developers will be launching new properties equivalent to 42% of the existing stock in Johor. That's close to 300,000 new dwellings, enough for 1.32 million people. Do you see that many people flocking to Johor? Would everyone really choose to retire or work in Johor, and earn 1/4 the wages of Singapore? Would crime eventually drop to Singapore's levels? Will the MRT be completed in 5 years? I seriously doubt if an MRT will even be completed by 2030, let alone 2020. The High Speed Rail will probably be completed earlier, maybe by 2025.
 
The name of the game in Iskandar is for the government and land owners to sell their land to developers, who then forb it to gullible Singaporeans / foreigners. The property indices may tell us that prices have appreciated by 80% in the last 5 years, but let me tell you that the truth is probably more disappointing. If you had bought a Horizon Hills property in 2011 for RM 780k, you'd probably just about sell it for RM 1.2m in end 2013. That's like 54% in capital gains and is as good as it gets. If you bought it in 2012, you'd probably had bought it at 975k and if you sell it at the peak in 2013, you'd made only 23%. If you bought an off plan terrace in HH for 1.3m at the peak, the price is probably closer to 1.1m now. Oh how the mighty has fallen.
 
Prices of condos in JB's old town have probably reached a new normal of RM400 - 500k, from 200 - 300k in 2010, for the resale market. Indeed, some people have made good money, but they are usually locals, not Singaporeans. Prices of terraces probably rose from 300 - 600k over the same period. But rental in Malaysia can never rise beyond 2k per month. Those who can pay over 2k would have bought a new home. This means that for a condo, the yield is probably only 4.8% to 6%. Still respectable. But if you bought something over 500k, you'd probably have trouble covering even the interest on your mortgage.
 
When you invest in properties, always go for cities where supply is constrained, and population growth constantly rising.... and invest in a country where the rule of law is strong!

My Experience Attending A Tokyo Property Exhibition

I recently attended an exhibition by a well-known property agency marketing new apartments in central Tokyo. Let's just say that the area where the apartment is located starts with the letter "M". The seminar started off very well, with the speaker highlighting Tokyo's economic importance, growth, and population growth. One area which I disagree very strongly was his assertion that USDJPY will drop (Yen strengthen) when economy strengthens. I then asked him how the price of the apartment compares against the older ones and he could not answer.

When the seminar ended, I approached two agents, who then showed me the unit layout, the price, and financing. However, when I pressed on with my questions on 1) how to compare against transacted properties in the same neighbourhood, the agents froze because there simply isn't any data. 2) I asked if the difference between off plan and a 10 year old property is around 25% (see chart below), how could I make money after 10 years? Instead of appreciating by 7% per year right from the start like I will in London  or New York City with existing properties, I will only enjoy 25% or only 4% per annum because depreciation is another 3% per year! In fact, a 30 year property is 60% cheaper than an off plan!! I might as well hit the sweet spot.

The other area which I could not contend with is the earthquake risk. New building technology apparently allows buildings to withstand up to 7 Richter Scale.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/16681136

According to the BBC article, a team of researchers from the University of Tokyo said there was a 75% probability that a magnitude 7 quake would strike the region in the next 4 years. The article was written on 23 Jan 2012. If they are right, there are only two more years before the BIG one hits. The Japanese government is more moderate, saying the chances are 70% in the next 30 years. A magnitude 9 earthquake is a possibility, and the nuclear fallout from Japan's plants will be unimaginable. Even if the building is still upright, it could be damaged and unfit for occupation.

Finally, my other worry is Abenomics' lack of third arrow of reform. There is just no willingness to open up the economy to foreigners. The demographics is such that the population will continue to shrink from 123 million inhabitants to around 100 million in 10 years. Tokyo will also decline in population inevitably, or see little growth. Rents will not increase and vacancy rates could rise.

What tickled me was that the agents told me point blank that "if I'm not keen to buy please leave the room!" which I promptly did. I've never met such unprofessional behaviour, employing hard selling tactics unheard since the 90s.


ARE Price Index (Central Tokyo)

From JapanRealEstateWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
The Akasaka Real Estate Price Index indicates the latest trends in central Tokyo apartment prices.
Areindex.gif
It shows the asking square meter price of an average 20 year old apartment in the 4 most central wards of Tokyo: Minato-ku, Shibuya-ku, Chiyoda-ku and Chuo-ku. It is updated several times a week and corrected for the age of the units on the market. It is not corrected for inflation.

Contents

[hide]

Time Series

To get the updated time series for this chart click here. I will take a minute or two to generate.

Asking Price

In Japan there is no central registry of real estate transactions and as such the transaction prices are only sporadically known. There are however several websites listing properties on the market. For central Tokyo these data sources are comprehensive and the data set is rather reliable. Given that the discount on the asking price is fairly constant at about 5% of the lowest listed price it makes sense to use the largest and most reliable data-set in Tokyo to calculate the trends in property prices.

Apartments

Traditional ways of measuring property prices in Japan involve measuring land prices. The advantages of measuring apartment prices instead are:
  • In Tokyo there are many more apartments than pieces of land and houses for sale. With more data it is easier to create reliable statistics
  • Land prices are dependent on the zoning, size, shape of the lot and direction of the land. Apartments are more uniform and are therefore easier to compare. The valuation of land is more complex and is dependent on the personal view of the appraiser. This can also lead to bias.
  • There is almost no rental market for land and it is very limited for houses in Tokyo. There is however a large apartment rental market and so the same methodology can be used for measuring rents. As a result the rental ratio can be calculated very accurately as it is calculated on the same properties.
  • Most indexes of cities around the world are based on apartment prices and not on land prices. Measuring apartments in Tokyo makes international comparison easier.
Houses in Japan normally depreciate completely within 20 to 30 years. House prices therefore reflect land value closely. Measuring house prices therefore suffers from the same disadvantages as measuring land prices.

Removal of Outliers

Listings with prices that are extremely outside the norm are automatically removed from the sample. Points with a square meter price more than 5 times higher or less than 5 times lower than average for their age are discarded.

Correction for Age

The average age of an apartment in Tokyo is not constant. The amount of construction fluctuates and as a result during boom times more new apartments come on the market than usual
Average age.gif
In the above chart you can see that the average age of an apartment for sale has slowly declined from 2005 and only started rising recently.
As shown below on average new apartments are around 2 1/2 times more expensive than 30 year old ones. During boom times the average price of an apartment increases much more due to the newer units on the market.
Pricedepreciationakasaka.gif
To counter this effect the price of an average 20 year old unit is chosen. Between 2005 and 2010 this is about the average age of an apartment in the involved area is about 20 year. The calculate the value of an average 20 year apartment every day a quadratic regression is done on all the available apartments in the involved area. The 20 year point on resulting regression is taken.
Quadraticregression.gif


Comparison of the ARE Index with the Land Institute of Japan

Every month the Land Institute of Japan brings out a report on Japanese real estate prices. In that report they publish the average square meter prices for "Existing Condominium Sales in Tokyo Metropolitan Area".
The differences between those numbers and the ARE Index are:
  • The Land Institute takes into account all wards of Tokyo, which includes sub-urban areas like Adachi-ku and Nerima-ku. Prices in those areas move in a different pattern from the inner-city.
  • The Land Institute calculates their numbers based on only the reported transactions. This is likely only around 10 to 20% of the total. The ARE Index takes into account all apartments on the market.
  • The Land Institute does not filter out the effect of the average age. As a result it over-reported the price increases for all of Tokyo in 2006 and 2007 when many new buildings came on the market.
Comparison ARE Index with Land Institute.jpg
From the chart it is clear the two indexes reported similar gains in 2007 and 2007. Even though the Land Institute over-reported the price increases in all of Tokyo, the overall numbers are comparable as the sub-urban areas did not increase so much. But around 2008 the indexes started to diverge. While the sub-urban areas were not so affected by the financial crisis, central Tokyo prices declined rapidly. At the same time the average age of the apartments stabilized as new construction was halted. Given that the Land Institute includes the sub-urban areas the difference between the two indexes became pronounced.
Even with their differences both numbers though however are superior indicators compared to the Land Price statistics that are commonly reported internationally.


IPD Recruit Residential Price Index (RRPI)

This is a transaction price-based investment index using a hedonic regression. Factors considered in the RRPI calculation:
  1. Floor space
  2. Minute to the nearest station
  3. Accessibility measured by minutes by train to the nearest train terminal
  4. Building age
  5. Balcony space
  6. Number of units in building
  7. Other characteristics
It gives final asking prices in magazines or online prices in magazines or online, according to the RRPI description . It is monthly, and uses hedonic regression. An Excel file is available here.
The resulting numbers seem reasonably correct. Compared to the ARE Index there is about a 3-4 month lag, clearly noticeable after the March 11 Earthquake. This index covers all of Tokyo so the price decline in 2011 is not as great as reported in the ARE Index, which covers just the central wards.

Recruit index.jpg

Sunday 9 March 2014

Australia: City By City Roundup and 2014 Forecasts

A city-by-city property roundup and 2014 forecasts

January 31, 2014, 12:10 pm Michael Yardney Yahoo!7
Zip around Australia, see how our property markets are performing and take a look at some forecasts for 2014.

Last year was one of the best years for property in a long time.
In fact, I believe it will be one of those years where those who didn’t get into the property markets will look back with regret.
Interestingly though, many of us started 2014 with confidence, over the last few weeks our markets gave us a few reminders not to get too “cocky.” Overseas the markets were more turbulent and back home inflation rose, unemployment crept up and consumer confidence dropped.
So what’s ahead for property in 2014?
I still see many reasons for property price growth in 2014, but the economy is putting some stumbling blocks in front of us, and it won’t be all smooth sailing – but it never is.
Today I’d like to whip around Australia, see how our property markets are performing and make some forecasts for 2014. But before I do let’s first look at...
What happened to property in 2013?
Our housing markets saw strong growth last year, with home values rising in every capital capital city, with Sydney (14.5 per cent) Perth (9.9 per cent) and Melbourne (8.5 per cent) being the stand out markets. These markets have been stimulated by strong population growth, increasing consumer confidence, low interest rates and the media beating up a little frenzy.

House prices rose in part because Australia's permanent population jumped by close to 400,000 people last year - that's enough people to populate a city the size of Canberra. That along with rising consumer confidence and lower interest rates meant higher housing demand.
But despite some property pessimists suggesting the market has run its course, there is plenty of life left in our markets.
You see...
Despite these price rises, housing is at its most affordable level in a decade according to the November H.I.A. - Commonwealth Bank housing affordability index, which tracks the relationship between household income, mortgage costs and home prices.
The major factors behind the growth in affordability have been growth in wages, historic low interest rates and home prices, which when adjusted for inflation, are still below their previous peak.

So where are we in the property cycle?
The property cycle bottomed in the middle of 2012 and since then the markets in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth have risen strongly retracing much of the losses they made in the previous 18 months, as show in the following graph from Dr. Andrew Wilson of Australian Property Monitors.

We are now entering the next phase of the property cycle - the expansionary stage -and property prices will keep increasing.
What these big picture figures don't show is how fragmented our markets are with different states, different price points and different types of properties behaving differently, so let's look at some of our major property markets in a little more detail:

Sydney



Median house price: $775,000; 15.2 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $557,000; 11.6 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 2.1 per cent
Sydney was the standout property market in 2013 with house prices now at record levels, and they’re likely to continue climbing.
However despite some experts suggesting another year of double digit capital growth for Sydney I would count on growth in the order of 7 per cent in selected well located properties over 2014.
While investors have taken advantage of rising property prices, first home buyers are still sitting on the sidelines and the top end of the market is still relatively flat according to George Raptis, director of Metropole Property Strategists in Sydney.
However gentrified suburbs, in particular Sydney’s inner west, upper north shore and west suburban regions within close proximity to transport, amenities and infrastructure are performing well.
"The high auction clearance rates we experienced over the last few months of 2013 are a sign of how strong certain segments of the market are. In particular investors are actively chasing well-located properties attracted by high yields and the prospects of strong capital growth. With strong momentum in the market and a shortage of good quality properties with around 17 per cent less stock on the market for sale than 12 months ago, I can see Sydney prices continuing to rise," says Raptis.

Melbourne



Median house price: $625,000; 8.5 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $481,000; 8.7 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 3.4 per cent
Melbourne was the surprise performer last year but (as always) the market is fragmented with the inner eastern, south-eastern as well as the outer eastern mid price range markets being the best performers.
While first homebuyer activity remains low, there has been increasing demand from both investors and owner occupiers upgrading their homes and in the second half of 2013 top end properties started selling well as the “big money” felt more confident.
Investor and owner-occupier demand is likely to remain solid in 2014, with overall growth in the order of 5 per cent - 7 per cent, however there are some segments of the Melbourne property market to avoid.
"There is a significant oversupply of newly built house-and-land packages in Melbourne's outer northern and western suburbs where buyers are showing a preference for two to three year old homes which can be bought considerably cheaper than new stock," said Keith Franklin, of Metropole Property Strategists in Melbourne.
"There is also an oversupply of inner-city CBD apartments and there are many more apartments coming on stream in the next few years at a time when there is less demand from the tenant demographic that rents in the CBD," adds Franklin.
"Currently there are some great investment opportunities buying established apartments in Melbourne's southern or eastern suburbs and adding value through renovations," he says.

Brisbane



Median house price: $470,000; 5.3 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $383,000; 3.5 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 2.8 per cent
The Brisbane property market finally turned the corner in 2013 buoyed by falling unemployment, population growth from southern job seekers and more property investors back in the market with the perception of good buying opportunities compared to the other big capital cities.
This comes at a time when the number of properties for sale remains low. An increasing number of property transactions and a tightening market are typical signs of the beginning of the upturn stage of the property cycle.
“There has been a resurgence of property investor activity over the last six months, with interest being particularly strong in the mid price range, inner and middle ring suburbs of Brisbane. With property prices still below their peaks of 2010,a there is still a lot of upside for Brisbane properties” said Shannon Davis, of Metropole Property Strategists in Brisbane.
Brisbane house prices are likely to increase by 5 to 7 percent over 2014.

Perth



Median house price: $537,250; 10.2 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $439,000; 6.3 per cent increase in last 12 months.}
Vacancy Rate: 2.1 per cent
I believe housing demand will soften in Perth because of flattening mining investment and profits dampening confidence and slowing migration.
There were already signs of flattening buyer activity over the latter part of 2013 and Perth prices are likely to only increase by between 5 and 7 percent in 2014.

Adelaide



Median house price: $405,000; 3.0 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $325,000; 0.6 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 1.6 per cent
Adelaide's housing market has consistently underperformed since the beginning of 2008, in line with its underperforming economy.
With the highest capital city unemployment rate and a weakening economy capital growth is likely to be similar to this year – in the order of 2 to 3 percent.

Darwin



Median house price: $595,000; 5.1 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $449,500; -3.9 per cent decrease in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 1.9 per cent
The Darwin property market has been hit by the slowdown in the mining sector. While it has been a strong performer over the last decade, fuelled strong investor sentiment, the excitement seems to be over.
I've always found investor driven markets more volatile than our big capital cities and that's why I avoid them. Darwin property prices are likely to only increase between three and five percent this year.

Hobart



Median house price: $350,000; 2.9 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $255,000; -5.1 per cent decrease in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 1.6 per cent
Hobart’s housing market finally picked up in late 2013 after a prolonged period of subdued activity.
However a relatively weak economy will limit property price growth to around 3 to 5 percent this year.

Canberra



Median house price: $570,000; 3.7 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Median unit price: $432,0000; 1.5 per cent increase in last 12 months.
Vacancy Rate: 2.4 per cent
The outlook for the Canberra housing market is cloudy with the Federal government warning us of significant budgetary cuts. Job insecurity, especially in the public sector, is likely to translate into subdued demand for housing and minimal capital growth in the Canberra property market in 2014.

Source of Data: RPData, SQM Research
What next?
Interestingly no one is really talking doom and gloom about property as they were a year ago, and even though there are some speed bumps ahead, there are many reasons to feel positive about property in 2014.
• The world’s large economies are improving, particularly our major trading partners the USA and China
• Our economy is also performing well
• Our population is growing and all the young Gen Y migrants will boost our economy by working hard, paying taxes, forming households and buying properties.
• Interest rates are low and housing affordability is high.
• Construction costs are increasing
• There is strong demand for property from overseas investors and a growing demographic of baby boomers investing through there self managed super funds.
• The market momentum will continue as more and more Australians want to take part in the property market as the media keeps reminding us that some properties are increasing in value by $600 - $1,000 a week.
But... you can't just buy any property
Home buyers and investors will have to do careful due diligence – they won't have booming property prices to cover up their mistakes this year.
This means they will need to buy the right type of property - One that has a level of scarcity, meaning it will be in continuous strong demand by owner occupiers (to keep pushing up its value) and tenants (to help subsidise the mortgage); in the right location (one that will outperformed the long term averages because of the demographics of the people living there), at the right time in the property cycle (that would be now in some states) and for the right price.
Then hold it as a long-term investment and reap the rewards.

Michael Yardney is a director of Metropole Property Strategists who create wealth for their clients through independent, unbiased property advice and advocacy. He is best-selling author, one of Australia's leading experts in wealth creation through property and writes the Property Update blog. Subscribe today and you'll receive a free video training - The Golden Rules of Property Investment.

Thursday 6 March 2014

Stock Markets Are Still Not Cheap.... More Volatlity Ahead!


From Warren Buffett

Ignore politics and macroeconomics when picking stocks.

“We will continue to ignore political and economic forecasts, which are an expensive distraction for many investors and businessmen. Thirty years ago, no one could have foreseen the huge expansion of the Vietnam War, wage and price controls, two oil shocks, the resignation of a president, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a one-day drop in the Dow of 508 points, or treasury bill yields fluctuating between 2.8% and 17.4%.
“But, surprise – none of these blockbuster events made the slightest dent in Ben Graham’s investment principles. Nor did they render unsound the negotiated purchases of fine businesses at sensible prices. Imagine the cost to us, then, if we had let a fear of unknowns cause us to defer or alter the deployment of capital. Indeed, we have usually made our best purchases when apprehensions about some macro event were at a peak. Fear is the foe of the faddist, but the friend of the fundamentalist.

I review the various stock markets weekly. Many investors may be pleasantly surprised that the Ukraine - Russian crisis did not result in war. I was not surprised. Many Russian Oligarchs park their money in London, Geneva and New York. They open private banking accounts, stash their money away in secret funds. They also buy trophy homes in London and New York. I'm sure the Oligarchs actually have a lot of say over Kremlin, and Putin is merely someone who helps them execute. Imagine if Russia invades Ukraine and move west. It would bring down property prices in London and New York due to the threat of war. Stock markets worldwide would plunge and the Oligarchs would see their wealth decimated. Putin's retirement plans would be in jeopardy.

Back to the stock markets. The cheapest markets now are:

1. Asian banks
2. HSCEI (China)
3. Russia
4. Japan
5. Global banks
6. Mining
7. Euro banks
8. Technology
9. Global stocks.

Most expensive markets that we should be wary off are:

1. Philippines
2. Euro real estate
3. American home builders
4. Indonesia
5. Thailand
6. Singapore.

However, as I mentioned in earlier posts, valuations are not everything. Earnings growth and monetary policy are equally important. If I combine all factors, the results are:

Those that I would buy are:

1. Global Tech. (cyclical) cheap valuation + good macros.
2. Euro banks (cyclical) cheap valuation + even better macros.
3. US banks (cyclical)... dollar cost.... from (3) downwards, not strong buys. same as (2).
4. Mining (cyclical) cheap valuations, not so strong macros.
5. Global banks (cyclical) cheap valuations, not so strong macros.
6. US stocks. not so cheap valuations. but good earnings growth and abundant liquidity.

Those that I would SELL are:
1. Europe. This is a big surprise. Valuations are not cheap. earnings are weak and liquidity is so-so. I would wait for a few more weeks before reacting. I suspect European coy's earnings will rise in 2H2014.
2. India. yield curve is inverted. earnings growth is weak.
3. Thailand. Valuations expensive. Earnings growth and liquidity poor.
4. Indonesia. Same as Thailand.

Conclusion:
1. Cyclicals are generally prime for a recovery.
2. General stock markets are not cheap.
3. Mining sector is making a recovery.
4. Tech and banking sectors are also making a comeback.
5. Liquidity is poor in Asia / EM due to inflation, rising interest rates. Earnings have disappointed too.
6. Europe's earnings may improve in 2H 2014.
7. It is still a sideways, trading market. reasons are still not compelling.

Sunday 2 March 2014

My Hard Truths...

  • An economist is a man who knows a hundred ways of making love but doesn’t know any women.
  • Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidise it.
  • An economist’s guess is liable to be as good as anybody else’s.

Are Rental Guarantees Real?



Are rental guarantees as safe as they sound?- Damian Collins

Damian CollinsAbout Damian Collins
Damian is managing director of Momentum Wealth, a Perth based property investment consultancy firm. A successful property investor in his own right, Damian formed Momentum Wealth to assist time poor investors in building their portfolios and applies his many years of experience to help clients accelerate their wealth creation. Visit Visit www.momentumwealth.com.au
As the old saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true it probably is. If you come across a property marketed with a rental guarantee, tread carefully.
Rental guarantees are usually a sign of an over-supplied product or area, a weak market, or simply a property that would otherwise struggle to meet an investor’s criteria for a “solid” investment.
Although guarantees are traditionally associated with government supplied housing, it is actually becoming more commonplace to see private developers provide rental guarantees, offering guaranteed yields of 6% or 7% for up to three years.
But be warned.
The guaranteed rental is usually already factored into the initial purchase price of the property (because of the security the guarantee offers) making it overvalued. Perhaps just as concerning is that when the guarantee period is over, the rent you can realistically achieve will in most cases be far less.
But how exactly do rental guarantees work?
Imagine a developer is struggling to sell his new units in an oversupplied market.
He needs to sell them for $600,000 but the market value is realistically only $520,000. Looking at comparable rents in the area it’s also likely that the achievable rent for the property will only be about $530 per week, a 4.6% yield on the $600,000 purchase price.
So the developer decides to sell the units for $600,000 each and offers a rental guarantee at $690 per week for two years, a 6% yield, to make the properties more enticing.
Think & Grow Rich ebook by Napoleon Hill
Once the unit is purchased, the investor will rent them out at the best market rate of $530 per week and the developer will make up the difference, which totals $16,640, over the two years.
Given that the developer sold the units at $600,000, he ends up pocketing around $63,000 more than if he had sold them at market value without the guarantee.
When the guarantee has ceased, the investor will be left to rent the property out at market value, not the inflated value they had been receiving.
Aside from private developers, there are also government agencies and hotel operators providing extended lease backs or rent guarantees, and although you may think the lengthy lease guarantees provide a level of security, do consider that if you need to sell at any point during this long period that you are locked into a rental contract with the tenant, meaning you can only sell to other investors.
This effectively eliminates around 70% of potential buyers and restricts the asking price. Along with the often inflated purchase price, this potential situation also makes some banks overly cautious and could make securing finance difficult, as would refinancing to realise any
potential equity.
When it comes to properties being offered with rental guarantees and long lease backs, I strongly advise to proceed with caution. Although there may be a handful of good buys, do be alert to the downsides and always get an independent valuation before purchase.
Peace of mind can be achieved without a rental guarantee, as long as you always buy a well-researched desirable property in a good quality area.
Momentum Wealth and its affiliated entities are not Accountants or Financial Planners. While all information is provided in good faith, you should seek your own independent advice in relation to all matters regarding investing, taxation and superannuation.
Michael Yardney's Daily BlogHi there,
If you enjoyed this article and would like to receive daily market updates from our panel of experts, subscribe to my daily blog.
You will also get to hear my personal views which are not published anywhere else. It’s ad free, no cost to you but readers tell me it’s of great benefit to them and it's a different subscription to my newsletter. 
Click here now
 and subscribe.
Michael Yardney.

Saturday 1 March 2014

Asian Cities Real Estate Face Dual Whammy of Rising Interest and Oversupply

Bangkok, Manila, Shanghai, Beijing, Singapore. Iskandar, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, all have something in common: because they escaped the Global Financial Crisis relatively unscathed, their developers continue building plans unabated. Therefore supply must necessarily catch up with demand by now.

If you don't buy right smack in the middle of the city or in the inner suburbs, when new home completions surpass demand, rents will fall.

From 2015, I'm expecting interest rates in the US to trend up. The toxic combination of falling rents and rising rates will cause price correction to accelerate.

The best time to refinance your property is when rates are low. We will probably need to wait for the next recession to see that.