Sunday 20 July 2014

Prime London Rents to Rise, Prices to Catch Up in Suburbs

Stage 1: Prime Central City Always Recovers First, Year 1 - 3 From Trough

Panoramic views from a penthouse overlooking Central Park, Manhattan New York, US. Do You Have US$10m to Spare Sir/Madam?


The pattern of recovery is the same which ever city you go to. When the property market hits the trough, the prime central area will always shoot up first. Rental yields usually plummets because rents cannot catch up. This happened in 2009. After 2 - 3 years of recovery, price appreciation slows down. This happened in 2014. This is because fewer and fewer people can afford to buy Prime Central London, or Orchard Road, Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, 10 and 11, or Manhattan New York. Sure, there will be occasional cash buyers by the Malaysian Datuks, Russian Oligarchs, Chinese tycoons. They don't need any mortgages. But there will also be pure investors who are keen to leverage to increase their IRR. I believe the make up of Prime Central London investors are as follows:

1. 40% foreign investors who don't need mortgages.

2. 20% foreign investors who need mortgages.

3. 25% Local investors cash buyers.

4. 15% Local investors who need mortgages

Since the gross yields are less than 3%, well below borrowing costs, it becomes more feasible to rent than to buy. Bare in mind that 35% of buyers will need mortgages and will find it difficult to get bank approvals. a 35% drop in demand without a corresponding fall in supply will almost certainly lead to a drop in prices.

At this point, the inner and outer suburbs, such as zones 2 and 3 in London, Brooklyn and Queens of NYC, Rest of Central Region like Geylang, Newton, Novena, Balestier, Tiong Bahru will not move much. This is because the domestic economy is still recovering. Employment is still falling, hence few have the budget to upsize their homes.

Smart investors will start to target the outer and inner suburbs in anticipation of faster growth and the higher yields. While the outer/inner suburbs may not allow tenants / dwellers to walk to work, it is usually just a 10 - 30 minute commute via train / bus / drive away. Inner suburbs are usually 1 - 7km from the CBD. Outer suburbs usually 8 - 14 km away. Gross yields in inner suburbs will usually 5% and outer suburbs 6%. Cashflow is usually positive with leverage.

Dublin, Madrid, Barcelona, Miami, Houston, Phoenix, Las Vegas, San Francisco, Seattle, Birmingham and Brisbane are in this phase.

Stage 2: Inner and Outer Suburbs Start to Recover Years 4 - 6

"Character Homes" in London Suburbs. They May Be Over 80 Years Old But Have Share of Freehold. Definitely Worth Over GBP500k or SGD 1m! Just 10 - 30 Minutes of Commute To CBD or Work Place


From 2013, Zone 2 and 3 London began to stir. Singapore's RCR region stirred in 2010, a little earlier. Brooklyn and Queens hit the trough at around 2013.... Domestic economy starts to recover. Banks start to loosen their mortgage lending standards, fuelling widespread price rises.

People who need to work in the CBD, who work long hours, usually from the Finance, Oil & Gas trading sectors need to get to work in the wee hours of 0730hrs. they cannot commute from more than 15km away, especially if the public transport is not efficient. They will be forced to rent in Prime Central / Inner / Outer suburbs. The corporate leasing sector will revive and boost rentals in central region.

Those who just entered the workforce will also choose to rent in the central/inner/outer as well, because it will mean a more "happening" place to be, lots of drinking holes and nice restaurants in the city, and a quick stumble home with a babe in arms after a titzy, alcohol fuelled Friday night out.

Families who are climbing up the financial ladder may try to move close to the CBD, and buy a home in the inner/outer suburbs nearer good schools. The make up of inner / outer suburb buyers are usually:

1. 20% foreign investors cash buyers.

2. 20% foreign investors with mortgages.

3. 20% local investors cash buyers.

4. 40% local investors with mortgages.

New supply is beginning to be completed. Housing starts reach all time high. There will be signs of oversupply in certain areas. In London, it could be in the Eastern suburbs. In Singapore, it could be Tampines, Woodlands and Jurong. In Malaysia, it could be Mont Kiara.... But overall, vacancy rates are still very tight.

Oh and most governments, post GFC will start to implement anti speculative measures to prevent another property bubble wreaking havoc. You can count on it. It's too fresh in the policy makers' memories.

Rents for CBD will start to creep up quickly due to corporate lets increasing. Yields will start to rise from 2% back up to 3%. Inner suburbs will see yields drop to 4% and outer suburbs 5%. Cashflow for inner/outer suburbs will either be neutral or slightly negative, a danger signal of a market peak coming in 3 - 4 years.

I would say that London has entered phase 2. Melbourne is definitely well into phase 2. Sydney is in early phase 2. New York as well...

Stage 3: Spill Over to Regional Areas, Cries of Bubbles... Years 7 - 9

 15 km From CBD, Usually With No Public Transport System. You May Take Over One Hour Of Journey Commuting To Work Daily. Good Regional Areas Are Near Good Schools But Shopping and Dining Choices Are Usually Limited. Mainly Owner Occupiers Who Are Families...


By year 7, governments will implement increasingly punitive measures. CBD will see yields of around 3% still. Although there is increased rental demand, supply has also increased as all the off plan properties are finally completed from year 7 of the cycle. Prices in the CBD could start to rise again and investors again find the negative cashflow more tolerable, as the job market improves. But this is merely a flash in the pan. In this phase, interest rates and borrowing costs are usually extremely high as the economy enters the late stage of the cycle.

Inner/outer suburbs have become unaffordable for most locals. Pockets of oversupply have spread to larger areas. Rumours of huge drops in rentals as contracts are renewed. Vacancy rates rise rapidly, void periods increase. Rumours of bankruptcies and owners who cannot afford to keep up with mortgage payments surface.

Singapore, KL, Iskandar, Manila, Beijing, Shanghai, Guanzhou, most Asian cities have entered this dangerous phase.

Investors should decide whether to take profit if they entered in stages 1 and 2, and are sitting huge profits. My advice is this: If the fundamentals of your suburb is right, e.g. infrastructure like good schools, shopping, food, train stations nearby, you should hold it and remortgage to get equity cash out. Most astute property investors hold their properties for over 10 years, or 2 cycles.

Gross yields in inner/outer suburbs will be around 3% / 4%, and definitely negative cashflow. Most families will sell up their apartments as their families grow with more kids, and move to the regional areas for more space.

The only time you should sell or take profit is when:

1. Massive oversupply still coming on stream. This is usually due to poor planning by the local government. E.g. Iskandar. It will bring your rents further down and make it difficult to service your mortgage. The oversupply could exaggerate the decline and prolong the downturn. Take for example properties in Newham and Tower Hamlets. They fell by over 30% since 2006 vs Prime Central London which fell by 15%. Since Prime Central London recovered in 2010, they were in the doldrums until 2013!

2. Infrastructure is in decline or about to be removed. This is rare as most schools, train stations will remain for decades to come.

3. Crime rate increasing, unemployment in the area rising. This is a sign of urban decay, as the local council mismanages the borough. Generally, this doesn't exist in Singapore. But it is prevalent in other cities, notably KL, Iskandar, NYC etc.

I usually don't recommend selling off your properties unless the fundamentals have changed. As Warren Buffett said, the best time to hold your stock is forever.

How I Analyse My Investments

I am passionate about investing, especially property, stocks and bonds. I have spent hundreds of hours understanding how data can be used to give me the edge on selecting stocks, bonds and cities / suburbs that will experience above average growth.

I believe that whatever my investment vehicle is: shares, property, business, forex, commodities, etc. - it all comes down to risk and return. For every property I buy, I draw up a detailed spreadsheet calculating my return on investment. Every spreadsheet has revealed just how important capital growth is. So that is where my focus has been. I want to apply the best research possible to maximise profit.

For properties, I'm not happy finding a good location.... I want the best cities in the world, the best location in the city. That requires tremendous amount of research. When researching my next purchase I try to use as much data as possible. I want every little bit of data working for me... and I scrutinise and qualify each. I believe it is possible to know a market better than a local without even visiting. The visit is the icing on the cake.

Prices move in response to changes in supply and demand. This is not only true for property, but for any investment asset. My research is based on finding locations with the highest future demand to supply.

It has been said that risk is ignorance. For example, the risk of buying some shares is that you don't "know" if they're going to go up or down in value. Not knowing what will happen, means there is risk. Therefore, the more you know conversely the less risk. It's also the quality of information that gives you the edge where others "in the know" may not.

Use this procedure to know as much as you can and to create a system for uncovering stocks / bonds / suburbs with the best potential for growth. It can be used to validate those hot tips that you might receive from friendly agents, brokers or relatives. If you're diligent and determined, you should get great results. You're certainly going to be a step ahead of most other investors which is crucial for getting in at the front end of any future growth.

 

What Singaporeans Should Be Buying But Because of Stupidity Or Laziness, Are Not Doing So...


These are examples of gorgeous houses and apartments that you can buy with S$1.3m. In Singapore, you can just about afford a 1000 sf condo in outer suburbs like Tampines or Jurong. Your child will have no space to run but watch TV and play computer games all day. In other countries, your child can expand energy by playing in the garden with the pet dog! Guess why 80% of Asian kids wear glasses?

1. 64/123-125 Macquarie Street Sydney (Built in 1923!)
 
A timeless offering of unequalled elegance and sophistication in a landmark community, this exquisite residence effortlessly balances period grace with stylish ultra contemporary necessity. Beautifully refurbished over approximately 92sqm, it is metres to the sweeping grounds of the Royal Botanic Gardens.

- Communal roof terrace with stunning harbour views

- Soaring 3.2 metre ceilings, traditional appointments
- Grand entrance foyer, polished timber floors, ample storage

Built in c1923, this grand building was the first high rise residential complex in Australia. With an unrestricted company title that allows for rental, it is just a short stroll to the Opera House, cinemas, cafes and the heart of the city.


http://www.realestate.com.au/property-apartment-nsw-sydney-116881335


2. 3LDK House to Buy in Meguro-ku

http://www.realestate.co.jp/en/forsale/view/252533

Tairamachi 2-chome Hosue 1

Price: ¥105,000,000 (US $1,050,000)

Disclaimer
Land Rights:Freehold
Occupancy:N/A
Gross Yield:N/A
Type:House
Floor:1 / 3F
Size:126.07 m²
Location: Meguro-ku, Tokyo
Nearest Station: Toritsu Daigaku Station
4 min. walk

6.3km from CBD. Built in 2010. No maintenance fee because it's a terrace.


 

Bubbles Are Emerging In Some Pockets...

Illogical Decisions and "Heuristics" that my friends / clients make

In my engagement with investors / clients, I realise the severity of the misjudgement they have over major risks. This type of judgemental error is called "HEURISTICS". https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/23-daily-habits-smarter-174229976.html    For example:

1. Singapore is a safe country and will never falter. This is a fallacy. The current government in Singapore is fast losing popular support because it is losing touch with the citizens. Global warming will put Singapore's water and food supply at risk. Singapore's neighbours are unpredictable at best. The recent announcement to reclaim land in the sea along the second link has caused environmental and territorial concerns.

2. Singapore's property prices will always go up. This is another fallacy. The government has planned enough housing for seven million people! Never again will authorities make the same mistake as in 2003 - 2011, or 1990 - 1997, when they failed to anticipate population growth.

I foresee Singapore's property prices to fall by 15 - 30% from now till 2016 before making a slow rebound. Going forward, Singapore's property prices will appreciate by 5% per year, in line with nominal GDP growth. It will never create household wealth like it did for the older generations.

3. I've been bearish on Iskandar property since 2012, but only like land. I was ridiculed and questioned by many readers and friends. Many just rattled about the infrastructure that will be built. But they forget that a leopard will never change its stripes. It's still the same government in charge. in the 1970s thousands of Singaporeans piled money stupidly to buy Desaru and JB properties. Many of the condos were never completed. 40 years later, a different bunch of Singaporeans are getting conned.

Bubbles are emerging slowly

Let me make this clear, I don't see a bubble even in the S&P500. Valuations may be rich, but interest rates are still rock bottom, which will fuel further rises. S&P500 has around 10 - 15% upside over 12 months.

But I do see "mini-bubbles" forming in real estate in China, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand etc. Mostly Asian cities. We may see more Asian developers defaulting as sales of off plan properties slow.

I do see London being "fairly valued", and some Australian cities like Melbourne and Sydney, although still cheap in terms of income multiples, have negative carry over mortgage rates. Most Australians prefer to buy not rent properties. Also, there is no shortage of condos or what they term as "units" in Australia.

There are no bubbles in the US, Ireland and European real estate sectors. These sectors are the safest area to invest in the mean time.

Increasingly, there are fewer and fewer things to invest. I can't wait for the US to hike short term rates so that it will hit those who are over leveraged. I can then pick things up cheap.

We are 2/3 of the way to our next recession. The last time we had one was in 2009. The US emerged from recession in 2010. The EU in 2013. I see 3 more good years before the next downfall so do play safe in your investments and keep lots of ammunition. If you're invested in balanced funds, keep your OD line half or 1/3 utilised because there will be a lot of opportunities in the next 3 years.

Anyway, below is a good article about Prof Shiller's points about market bubbles.

www.gurufocus.com/news/268267/double-bubble-toil-and-trouble