Monday 24 February 2014

Recap Back At My Property Views

I recalled several of my predictions on real estate around the world and found most of them came true. Here is the list:
1. I predicted back in 2011 that 2013 will be the tipping point for Singapore residential properties and it will dip between 15-30% until 2016. 

2. I predicted in mid 2012 that London will be poised to take off due to demand supply imbalances and low interest rates. 

http://musingsonwallstreet.blogspot.sg/2013/03/an-anatomy-of-property-bubble-case_17.html

3. I predicted in March 2013 that there will be MASSIVE OVERSUPPLY of Iskandar properties, especially in the condominium sectors. I expect condo prices in Iskandar to plunge between 20-50% next 5 years. Those that foreigners bought will definitely bear the brunt of the fall, while those bought for around RM200-300k will not see much drops. Landed properties will hold the value better and fall between 10-30%. Commercial properties in the Nusajaya area where the population hasn't risen will fall as much. Occupancy rates in offices, retail and resi are around 60-70%.

4. I predicted in june 2012 that US has reached the bottom.

5. Now I will tell you that the following cities will see great opportunities:
Major US cities like New York, Houston, LA, Seattle, Austin, Florida will still see 30-50% upside in the next 5 years.

Australia is Mixed bag, but cities like Perth , Brisbane still generate positive spread over borrowing costs, while Sydney and Melbourne look expensive.

Tokyo is a good bet, but you cannot buy new. The difference between a 30-year property and new one is around 60%!! And the yield is only 4% for new but 8% for an old one in the city centre! also! you need to buy outside the city centre to achieve 8-10% yield for maximum capital appreciation. 

London is now a HOLD. it has gone on a terminal velocity trajectory until 2018, when supply finally meets demand. Within this period, I expect around 25% capital appreciation! which isn't that much compared to other cities.

The last bastion for resi property investment is now in continental Europe. Prices are bottoming but you must pay in cash! No mortgage is available. 



Red flags raised in Johor property market
BT 20140218 JBPROP18 962058
Wait and see: Developers are bogged down with a decline in sentiment due to cooling measures and policy changes. - FILE PHOTO
[JOHOR BAHRU] The property market in Johor, particularly Iskandar Malaysia, might be a case of too much too soon. According to The Star newspaper, red flags are showing in the state where launches of projects and high prices are commonplace but the pace of launches, which now includes "carpet building" by China developers, is flooding the market with more houses than what could be sustainable.
"We welcome foreign developers including those from China, but flooding the market with massive supply of properties could create property overhang," Johor Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (Rehda) chairman Koh Moo Hing told the daily during the weekend.
Latest data by the National Property Information Centre (Napic) indicate that the amount of new homes being built in the near future is equivalent to 42 per cent of the stock of 702,101 houses in the state. Almost 300,000 homes are being built or in the planning stage at a time when the market in Johor has hit a soft patch. Napic data show that at the third quarter of last year, construction for 116,859 homes had already started while the building of 162,579 homes have yet to start.
Meanwhile, 16,168 homes had been approved for construction in Johor in that quarter alone. Analysts say that the new supply does not include new launches by Iskandar Waterfront Holdings Bhd, which is expected to increase three-fold to more than 4,000 units and is expected to remain elevated up to 2017.
The supply of new homes does not seem to be putting a lid on the escalation of home prices in the state. As the new launches are priced thereabouts or even higher than what is being sold in the more established Klang Valley, the new supply of homes and their higher prices have had a telling impact on prices in the state. The average residential value for Johor property has risen some 45 per cent over the past five years to RM197,147 (S$75,000) in 2012 from RM136,034 in 2009. Comparatively, the country's average residential value has gone up by only 30 per cent in the same period to RM248,515.
Research house Hwang-DBS Vickers Research notes that recent launches in Nusajaya, Medini, Danga Bay and Johor Bahru are in the range of RM600-1,000 per square foot, with prime units hitting RM1,500 psf. Given that there is going to be an oversupply of homes in Johor, a slew of launches by China-based developers recently has got some worried. The grand entrance of China-based Country Garden Holdings surprised many with the launch of 9,000 apartment units at one go, causing local players to keep a close watch on how they will impact the market there.
Mr Koh believes that the magnitude and scale of such launches could lead to a property bubble if foreign developers are given a free hand in their development projects. Rehda is hoping for the state government to possibly impose regulations that limit the number of units built within a year to match the market's demands, says Mr Koh.
Hwang-DBS Vickers Research says that Country Garden's 9,000-unit launch in Danga Bay alone could cause a glut, although delivery could be challenging given tight building materials and labour supply over the next three to four years. Analysts are concerned that these developers would replicate the ghost towns in China and if overbuilding does occur in Iskandar, that can be detrimental to the overall physical market in the mid-term. However, some property analysts say that the extra supply would not pose an issue if foreign developers were attracting foreign buyers, rather than targeting only domestic buyers.
Country Garden, which has impressively sold about 70 per cent of its Danga Bay maiden project in Malaysia, launched in August, said via e-mail that some 3,000 units were snapped up by Malaysians. Meanwhile, about 50 per cent of its foreign buyers are Singaporean and 45 per cent are Chinese. Most of its units were snapped up within a month.
Then, there is Hong Kong-listed Guangzhou R&F Properties, which recently bought 116 acres in Johor Bahru from the Sultan of Johor for RM4.5 billion. Market talk is that a 19-block development is in the blueprint. But according to its filing with the Hong Kong exchange, Guangzhou R&F plans to develop high-rise residential units, low-density housing, retail properties, offices, hotel and a shopping mall, all of which will be on a saleable floor area of about 3.5 million square metres. That's almost 10 times the floor space of the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur. Also, Hao Yuan Investment, which is believed to be a China-linked company registered in Singapore, is forming a joint venture with Iskandar Waterfront Holdings to develop 15 hectares in Danga Bay.
Not all are alarmed by the entry of China developers. "The sprouting of Chinese investors in Malaysia is in tandem with the government's initiative to make Malaysia an international real estate investment destination. Chinese developers have been investing in bluechip locations of New York, Los Angeles, London, Sydney, Singapore and their presence in Malaysia bodes well for the market," says Zerin Properties chief executive officer Previn Singhe.
He is unperturbed by the potential flooding of homes in the future as the supply coming in will be spread over a couple of years. "Once all the catalytic projects are in place, there would be requirements for new homes to accommodate migrations," he says.
Although rumour has it that Country Garden has been offering its Chinese buyers a deal that packages a unit in Iskandar together with a purchase of their property in China, it is insignificant to pushing up prices in the area, says V Sivadas, executive director of PA International Property Consultants Sdn Bhd.
As local and foreign developers grapple and challenge for customers when launching projects in Iskandar Malaysia, the surge in supply coming in has been startling. The slew of houses slated to be built together with a market that is taking a breather after seeing an up-rush in prices and cooling measures starting to bite has seen take-up rates of new developments almost grind to a halt. Post-Budget 2014, take-up rates have come in poorly with developers such as UEM Sunrise Bhd recording only 20 per cent in bookings for its latest project Almas Suites - a small office/home office development in Puteri Harbour. The project, which comprises 526 units, has reportedly completed a measly four sale and purchase agreements.
"In any case, competition in a growing market such as Iskandar Malaysia, is a good thing - it keeps all of us on our toes and ensures that property buyers have a wide variety of products to choose from. As we all strive to improve, greater value will be created for our customers, investors and end users," says Eco World Development Group Bhd CEO Chang Khim Wah.
However, this year could look bleak for developers as they are bogged down with a decline in sentiment brought about by the cooling measures such as the increase in real property gains tax, as well as the abolishment of the developers interest bearing scheme, introduced in the latest budget. Also, policies such as the change of the weekend differing from Kuala Lumpur and Singapore has caused a negative knee-jerk reaction with many developers and buyers adopting a wait-and-see attitude.

Sunday 23 February 2014

Good Quote From Movie "Fight Club"

"Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need". Fight Club 1999.

Monday 17 February 2014

Great Property Investors That I Look Up To

I generally get bored when I'm surrounded by people whom I cannot learn anything from. Don't get me wrong, many people that I've met are generally nice. But I need that intellectual boost, I'm an idea junkie, in order to boost my day. Between 9am to 6pm most days, my brain is inactive. It is only at night that I start to think, read, and watch videos of great investors, and get inspired.

I am extremely impressed by how a small nation like Australia can produce so many wonderful property investors who wrote so many books, produced so many videos that inspired me. Brett Allegre-Wood of YPC, Nathan Birch, Cam McLellan and Helen Collier-Kogtevs are the many that gave me wonderful ideas on how to achieve my financial goals.

In Singapore, there are plenty of so-called experts which I shall not mention names. Many of them make you pay thousands of dollars, only to sell you either highly marked up properties or attempting to entice you to invest in their property funds with a lot of hidden costs. The few that genuinely taught good courses are Getty Goh, Ku Swee Yong and Dillon Loi. I've had the good fortune of knowing a few of these gurus, from Getty to Brett.

Over in the UK, investors like Fergus Wilson are simply inspiring, owning over 1000 properties. Another person by the name of Eugin Song has also been extremely instrumental in guiding me on where to look for bargains.

Singapore needs more inspirational people who can teach others how to be financially free, without the hidden sales agenda B.S. I aim to be one such person one day.

Saturday 15 February 2014

Gold may enter a neutral territory.


One way to measure gold is to compare an ounce of gold against the Dow Jones Industrials. The Dow vs Gold ratio is currently not at the highest. But it is above average. I would say that the inflexion point where gold starts to rally is around 16.55 back in Jul 1929, 25 in Jul 1965, 41.61 in Jul 1999. These are the points where stocks are expensive relative to gold. The average point is around 27.8x.

The periods where gold start their bear trend are: Feb 1933, 1.94x, Feb 1980 1.3. The average is around 1.62x. The median is probably around 14.7x. Right now the ratio is around 12.38x.. It is slightly on the expensive side.



Even though there was a rebound from 1180 to 1320 oz recently, the trend has not confirmed.

I'm neutral gold at the moment. Here are the reasons:
Positives for gold:
1. Chinese buying up 41% in Jan 14.
2. At 1180 oz, gold fell around 39% from 1931 back in Sep 2011. This drop is bigger than the last drop in 2008.
3. Inflation is likely to occur in the west from 2015 onwards, as unemployment rate continues to fall.

Negatives for gold:
1. Chart is neutral.
2. ETF selling still ongoing.
3. UST 10 years may rise above 3.5% by end 2014, making gold less attractive.

If your allocation to gold is a mere 10%, you can hold on to it. If you have > 10% exposure, then sell down to 10%. If you have < 10% gold, you can start adding until you hit the magical exposure.

Why I think the mining sector has bottomed! Part 2


After peaking in Dec 2010, the mining index fell by 48%! The Chinese economy slowed. There was oversupply in commodity supply. The Chinese mines were producing at breakneck pace, such that they will be net exporters by 2015 / 16. Coal miners were being phased out as new environmental laws sought to curtail coal fired power plants in China. After years of wastage, lavish spending by miners, the costs have caught up with revenue.

After three years of decline, many smaller mines have closed. Capex shrank. Valuations of mining stocks fell below median levels.

Chart wise, the monthly chart indicates an important inflexion point.

Why I believe the mining sector has finally hit rock bottom

PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 14, 2014
Rio Tinto ups dividend after H2 earnings climb 43%
Underlying profit rises to US$6b from US$4.2b a year ago
BT 20140214 TINTO14 957835
Mr Walsh: Has cut US$2.3 billion in costs after taking over as CEO over a year ago. He also curbed investment following criticism from investors that the world's biggest mining companies had overspent on acquisitions and expansions. - PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
[LONDON] Rio Tinto Group, the world's second-largest mining company, bolstered its dividend after reporting a 43 per cent gain in second-half profit as prices for iron ore advanced and it beat a cost-cutting target.
Underlying profit was US$6 billion in the six months ended Dec 31 from US$4.2 billion a year earlier, London-based Rio said yesterday. That compares with the US$5.1 billion average estimate of eight analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. It increased its dividend by 15 per cent to 192 cents a share for the year.
Since his appointment slightly over a year ago, chief executive officer Sam Walsh has cut US$2.3 billion in costs and curbed investment following criticism from investors that the world's biggest mining companies had overspent on acquisitions and expansions. Analysts are now expecting Rio to bolster shareholder returns as cost savings enhance earnings.
"It's a strong signal with regard to capital allocation being sent by Rio with a 15 per cent hike in the dividend," Richard Knights, an analyst at Liberum Capital in London, said yesterday. "Rio has sent a clear message that it is listening to shareholders."
"That's the real proof in the pudding that we are actually delivering greater shareholder value," Mr Walsh, a 64-year-old Australian, said yesterday on a call with reporters referring to the dividend. "It's also a tick in terms of the confidence we have in the business going forward."
Iron ore is the biggest contributor to Rio's results, followed by copper. The price of the raw material climbed 15 per cent in the second half of 2013 as China, the world's biggest buyer, boosted stockpiles to the highest in more than a year. The price has dropped 10 per cent this year.
The outlook for the Chinese economy "remains positive", Mr Walsh said in a presentation yesterday.
Rio is the biggest iron ore exporter after Brazil's Vale SA. Increased supplies will trim prices this year, Mr Walsh said in a December interview. Banks from Goldman Sachs to UBS expect supply expansions led by Australian producers to push the seaborne market into surplus in 2014.
In a bid to placate increasingly vocal shareholders, the world's largest mining companies are reining in spending after a decade-long boom in metal prices petered out. Glencore Xstrata CEO Ivan Glasenberg said a year ago his peers had overinvested, swamping the industry with new mines and production. Rio's Mr Walsh is seeking to cut costs by a further US$1 billion this year.
"The cost-cutting combined with the capex ramp-down put Rio in a position to increase its returns," Deutsche Bank analysts Rob Clifford, Anna Mulholland and Paul Young wrote in a Feb 10 report. The company could return as much as US$3 billion of surplus cash to investors in 2016, Goldman Sachs analysts said in December.
Rio plans to cut capital spending to about US$8 billion in 2015, less than half its outlay in 2012. This year's focus will be on reducing debt, which rose to about US$22 billion at June 30, chief financial officer Chris Lynch said in December. It reduced debt by US$4 billion in the half year to US$18.1 billion.
Underlying profit for the full-year was US$10.2 billion, or 553.1 cents a share, from US$9.3 billion, or 501.3 cents, a year earlier. That compares with the US$9.7 billion average of 23 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Net income was US$3.7 billion after a loss of US$3 billion in 2012. - Bloomberg

Saturday 1 February 2014

Whether Stocks Or Properties, The Name of the Game is the Same!

Stock markets worldwide are finally being smashed. The US Fed just announced a further USD10 billion cut in QE, which means that they print USD65 billion of money per month! Like a vacuum cleaner, the Fed's action sucks money from various countries, especially those that are poorly managed; with large current account deficits, small foreign reserves and large fiscal deficits. Countries like Turkey, India, Indonesia, and Brazil come to mind.

This could be a huge correction of 10 - 25% worldwide. To me, it's an opportunity to buy more, but when it gets cheaper. Whether with stocks or properties, the rules are the same:

1. Buy below market value, or buy when stocks are cheaper than median. We could see stocks falling below median levels again. S&P500 is at around 17x historical now and 15.4x forward. Should there be a 15% correction, we could see it falling to 15x historical and 13.3x forward. It would be cheap again to buy.

2. Cashflow and yields are important. Every property that I buy must take care of itself. It must either be slightly cashflow negative or neutral at least. Dividend yields / earnings yields from stocks should ideally be over 3% more than 10-year govt bond yield

3. Future development, or potential positive developments. There should be something to look forward to, whether be it a future CrossRail Station, or a Westfield coming up nearby. Stocks should have some positive developments in future, e.g. Metro which owns several real estate and could pump the assets into a REIT in future.